On Linux systems, ncdu (NCurses Disk Usage) is the classic disk space analysis tool, while gdu (Go Disk Usage) is a powerful recent challenger.
Both use terminal-based interactive interfaces, but differ in performance, underlying technology, and functional emphasis.
1. Core Comparison
Feature
ncdu
gdu
Underlying Language
C
Go
Scanning Speed
Fast (single-threaded)
Extremely fast (leverages multi-core concurrent scanning)
Interactivity
Classic NCurses interface
ncdu-like interface with color highlighting
Concurrent Processing
No
Yes (especially advantageous on SSDs)
Deletion Capability
Supported
Supported
Binary Size
Extremely small
Slightly larger (statically compiled)
Key Strengths
Highly stable; available in nearly all official repositories
Blazing speed; modern visual presentation
2. Detailed Comparative Analysis
Performance (Core Difference)
The core advantage of gdu lies in its concurrent scanning. On modern machines equipped with solid-state drives (SSDs), gdu can simultaneously utilize multiple CPU cores to traverse directory trees. For massive data volumes containing millions of files, gdu’s scan speed is typically several times faster than ncdu’s.
ncdu operates in single-threaded mode. While concurrency yields limited gains on traditional hard disk drives (HDDs), ncdu’s efficiency clearly lags behind gdu on SSDs.
Compatibility and Deployment
ncdu, a long-established tool, is pre-packaged in the official repositories of virtually all mainstream Linux distributions. It is often the preferred choice in minimal server environments or on embedded devices.
gdu, distributed as a single statically-linked binary, is also extremely simple to deploy. It is better suited for developers or system administrators seeking a modern, high-performance upgrade to ncdu on personal workstations or high-end servers.
Visuals and Interaction
ncdu features an elegantly minimalist interface—classic 1990s terminal aesthetics.
gdu, enabled by default with color support, uses distinct colors to differentiate directories from files and clearly displays space-usage percentages—visually more aligned with modern expectations.
3. Common Command Comparison
The operational logic of both tools is highly similar, enabling near-seamless switching.
Basic scan:
ncdu /path/to/dir
gdu /path/to/dir
Scan only current filesystem (do not cross mount points):
ncdu -x /
gdu -x /
Common interactive shortcuts:
Up/Down or j/k: Move cursor
Enter: Enter selected directory
d: Delete selected file or directory
q: Quit
4. Summary and Recommendations
Choose ncdu when:
You are maintaining a very legacy server.
You demand near-absolute software stability.
You prefer a minimalist, color-free interface.
Choose gdu when:
You need to scan directories containing massive numbers of small files (e.g., node_modules, machine learning datasets).
You are using SSD or NVMe storage.
You prefer a modern, color-highlighted, and more responsive tool.
One-sentence recommendation: If you prioritize maximum scanning efficiency, switch directly to gdu; if you only occasionally inspect disk usage on a server, ncdu remains more than sufficient.